eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plPrawoGrupypl.soc.prawo › Czy SG jest w prawie tego użyć (bez "wyższej+ konieczności")? [Skunks (Broń)]
Ilość wypowiedzi w tym wątku: 2

  • 1. Data: 2021-11-15 15:36:51
    Temat: Czy SG jest w prawie tego użyć (bez "wyższej+ konieczności")? [Skunks (Broń)]
    Od: "A. Filip" <a...@p...pl>

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunk_(weapon)
    > "Skunk" is a malodorant, non-lethal weapon used for crowd control by
    > the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and marketed to militaries and law
    > enforcement around the world. It was developed and is manufactured by
    > Odortec, with two supporting companies, Man and Beit-Alfa
    > Technologies.[1] The liquid's strong odor is marketed as an
    > improvement over other crowd control weapons (CCWs) such as rubber
    > bullets and tear gas used by the IDF against Palestinian
    > protestors. The IDF is criticized for its tactics during deployment,
    > including common use against people, businesses, and neighborhoods not
    > involved in protests as a form of collective punishment.[2][3] [4] [5]

    Zabójcze nie jest a ponoć skuteczne nawet bez uwzględnienia ostatniego
    zdania :-)

    Ewentualnie można w to wyposażyć wojsko i "trzymać w rezerwie".

    --
    A. Filip
    | Wariat ma każdego dnia wesele. (Przysłowie ormiańskie)


  • 2. Data: 2021-11-15 16:44:22
    Temat: Re: Czy SG jest w prawie tego użyć (bez "wyższej+ konieczności")? [Skunks (Broń)]
    Od: "J.F" <j...@p...onet.pl>

    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:36:51 +0100 (CET), A. Filip wrote:
    > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunk_(weapon)
    >> "Skunk" is a malodorant, non-lethal weapon used for crowd control by
    >> the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and marketed to militaries and law
    >> enforcement around the world. It was developed and is manufactured by
    >> Odortec, with two supporting companies, Man and Beit-Alfa
    >> Technologies.[1] The liquid's strong odor is marketed as an
    >> improvement over other crowd control weapons (CCWs) such as rubber
    >> bullets and tear gas used by the IDF against Palestinian
    >> protestors. The IDF is criticized for its tactics during deployment,
    >> including common use against people, businesses, and neighborhoods not
    >> involved in protests as a form of collective punishment.[2][3] [4] [5]
    >
    > Zabójcze nie jest a ponoć skuteczne nawet bez uwzględnienia ostatniego
    > zdania :-)
    > Ewentualnie można w to wyposażyć wojsko i "trzymać w rezerwie".

    No wiec wlasnie - najpierw trzeba kupic lub wyprodukowac.
    Na razie nie mamy.

    Pokropic Bialorus ... chyba nie wolno.
    Pokropic po naszej stronie ... no, ciekawe czy skuteczne, bo taka
    druga mysli - migranci sobie w smrodzie zasieki potną,
    a nasze sluzby beda musialy w smrodzie stac i pilnowac.

    No i kwestia ekologiczna zostaje - wolno tak chemikaliami kropic
    polski las ?


    J.


strony : [ 1 ]


Szukaj w grupach

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1