On 2022-03-02, A. Filip <a...@p...pl> wrote:
> [ za news:uk.politics.misc ]
> Czy może teraz obowiązuje już inna prawda etapu?
>
> https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/03/23/iraq-must-not-pa
rade-pows
>> March 23, 2003 7:00PM EST ;
>> Iraq Must Not Parade POWs
>> U.S. Should Also Protect POWs from Improper Exposure
>> It violates the Geneva Conventions for either the Iraqi or the
>> U.S. government to deliberately expose prisoners of war (POWs) to the
>> media, Human Rights Watch said today. [...]
>
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10568725/We
-sent-cannon-fodder-killing-peaceful-people-Weeping-
Russian-POWs.html
>> 'We were sent as cannon fodder. We're killing peaceful people':
>> Weeping Russian POWs say they had no idea they were being sent to war
>> and were made 'to attack people defending their territory'
>>
>> Published: 10:58 GMT, 2 March 2022 | Updated: 15:34 GMT, 2 March 2022

A co to jest "Improper Exposure"? Dlaczego uważasz, że tu miało ono
miejsce? Poza tym jest jeszcze kwestia potencjalnego przyzwolenia samych
jeńców. Nie chce mi się czytać całości tego art. ale wynika z niego, że
zostali do tych wyznań zmuszeni a i pewnie ktos tam w poblizu kroił
cebulę?

--
Marcin