eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plPrawoGrupypl.soc.prawo › USA: Zamach parlamentu na posągowość Sądu Najwyższego [niekonstytucyjność wyzwolenia niewolnika (1857 7:2)]
Ilość wypowiedzi w tym wątku: 1

  • 1. Data: 2022-12-16 06:27:53
    Temat: USA: Zamach parlamentu na posągowość Sądu Najwyższego [niekonstytucyjność wyzwolenia niewolnika (1857 7:2)]
    Od: "A. Filip" <a...@p...pl>

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/congress-votes-remo
    ve-bust-chief-justice-authored-dred-scott-decisio
    > Published December 15, 2022 3:16pm EST ;
    > Congress votes to remove bust of chief justice who authored Dred Scott
    > decision
    > House lawmakers on Wednesday passed a bill to remove a bust of Roger
    > B. Taney, the late Supreme Court justice who authored the Dred Scott
    > decision in 1857, ruling that Black people could not become
    > U.S. citizens. [...]
    > The bust of Taney, the nation's fifth chief justice, who led the court
    > from 1836 to 1864, currently sits inside the entrance to the Old
    > Supreme Court Chamber in the U.S. Capitol where the high court met
    > from 1810 until 1860. Statues of Taney were previously removed in his
    > home state of Maryland. [...]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott
    > Dred Scott (c. 1799 - September 17, 1858) was an enslaved
    > African-American man who, along with his wife, Harriet, unsuccessfully
    > sued for freedom for themselves and their two daughters in the Dred
    > Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott
    > decision". The case centered on Dred and Harriet Scott and their
    > children, Eliza and Lizzie. The Scotts claimed that they should be
    > granted their freedom because Dred had lived in Illinois and the
    > Wisconsin Territory for four years, where slavery was illegal, and
    > laws in those jurisdictions said that slaveholders gave up their
    > rights to slaves if they stayed for an extended period.
    > In a landmark case, the United States Supreme Court decided 7-2
    > against Scott, finding that neither he nor any other person of African
    > ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore
    > Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of
    > citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott's temporary residence in free
    > territory outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation,
    > because the Missouri Compromise, which made that territory free by
    > prohibiting slavery north of the 36°30´ parallel, was unconstitutional
    > because it "deprives citizens of their [slave] property without due
    > process of law".

    --
    A. Filip
    | Nie daj drzemać sokołom w kapturkach na grzbiecie.
    | (Przysłowie arabskie)

strony : [ 1 ]


Szukaj w grupach

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1